Is a new wind blowing through India's villages and hills? It's still too early to tellPublished by MAC on 2009-08-25
India's new Minister of the Environment and Forests (MoEF), Jairam Ramesh, has one of the toughest jobs in politics (and not just for India).
And he faces a daunting dilemma: How to resist huge pressures to fast-track industrial development, exerted by corporate lobbies and some of his own colleagues, while faithfully implementing the letter of the law?
Encapsulated (if imperfectly) in the Forest Rights legislation of 2006 was the right of forest dwellers - mostly Adivasi or Indigenous communities - to halt "development" which they consider not to be in their interests.
In his brief tenure to date at the MoEF, Ramesh has demonstrated refreshing enthusiasm for the task. But the devils are in the detail - both at central level and right down to the ground.
It's far too soon to claim that a new wind is blowing through the land.
Yes, something of a breeze seems to be wafting towards Nyamgiri - site of a proposed massive bauxite mine. This has already proved to be the most controversial of India's brace of planned mining projects, at least so far as the rest of the world is concerned. There are many more such ventures which have not attracted anything like the publicity this one has generated in Europe, particularly in the UK.
Vedanta's flagship project may be in doubt
But whether the gust becomes more substantial depends largely on the tenacity of Mr Ramesh and his supporters. One might already detect a slight change in the highly aggressive attitude formerly adopted (at least in public) by Vedanta Resources plc, the London company behind the Nyamgiri project.
At the company's annual general meeting in London on July 27th, Vedanta's executive chairman, Anil Agarwal, made a point of stressing that Vedanta hadn't got permission yet to mine Nyamgiri. (In fact it isn't Vedanta but its subsidiary, Sterlite Industries India Ltd, which was granted joint ownership with the Orissa government of the project.)
Nonetheless, Agarwal's statement was manifestly aimed at defusing growing anger directed at the project, rather than confronting any key issues. In no way did he evince serious intent to address numerous allegations of environmental and human rights violations which have already occurred; or are virtually certain to occur in the future.
On the contrary, on several occasions between January and July this year, Agarwal has boasted that the mine was ready to go, and would be opened within a few months.
It is largely because of local peoples' direct interventions that the time line has had to be moved back.
[Comment by Nostromo Research, 24 August 2009]
Can Jairam Ramesh tackle the bull by its horns?
19 August 2009
Winds of change are sweeping across the dusty corridors of the once quiet Ministry of Environment and Forests. For ten years this Ministry has been with the DMK - but election 2009 changed it all. Now speculation is rife on whether the environment will be better protected in the hands of a Congress minister? Can minister Jairam Ramesh bring back the golden period in India's environmental history when Indira Gandhi with one phone call could halt a dam being constructed in Silent Valley, or where the first family took pride and personal interest in saving India 's big cats.
But the Congress of the 80's is very different from the Congress of 2009, in which minister Jairam Ramesh has been given the green mandate. In order to maintain a growth rate of 8-9% it is India's forests, mineral and water resources that are facing an unprecedented onslaught. And in recent years the MoEF has earned the dubious record of being the 'Ministry of Environment and Forest Clearance'. In a short span of 2004 to 2006 India lost over 25000 sq km. of dense forest to industrial and development projects. A ministry which is supposed to be the watchdog of a natural treasury of 67 million hectares of forest and over 15,000 species of wild plants and animals has been clearing projects with virtually little or no opposition.
Shaking a ministry after years of lethargy will be the biggest challenge for the new minister. And shaking his own legacy even bigger. The minister belongs to the school of liberalisation and economic reforms. The same reforms, which may have put India on the super economic highway but with losses, that are unaccounted for. Coal mines in tiger reserves and elephant habitats, roads bifurcating national parks and mega dams submerging prime tropical forests worth millions of dollars. India's forests and those who live close to them are perhaps paying the heaviest price for the nation's progress as a superpower. Little wonder then that when Jairam Ramesh, took over the environment ministry, the green lobby has been sceptical about his commitment to the green cause.
But the minister has taken his new role seriously. Since he has taken over he has called for a review of several projects, initiated a number of policy announcements, visits to institutions like the Wildlife Institute, interacting with scientists, and synergising the work of thirty tiger reserves across the country. He is also a minister with new ideas. Plans are now afoot to introduce the National Green Tribunal, a single judicial body to decide on all matters relating to the environment. With this, the functioning of two existing bodies - the National Environment Appellate Authority and the Central Empowered Committee of the Supreme Court could be impacted. While the dissolution of the former is good, the latter may not be.
The National Environment Appellate Authority (NEAA) -- the only judicial body in the country to hear grievances against environment clearance process
has the dubious record of dismissing all but one petition in the last 12 years.
According to an RTI filed by Delhi-based environment lawyer Ritwick Dutta - no site visits have been made by any members of the NEAA except to places of religious interest -- Shirdi and Varanasi. And none of these religious trips had anything to do with the cases being heard by the NEAA.
In contrast the other quasi-judicial body, which may also become a victim of the National Green Tribunal is the Central Empowered Committee of the Supreme Court, which looks into all matters related to diversion of forests for non-forest activities.
With a motley group of forest officers and bureaucrats this is perhaps the only body that has taken its role of a watchdog of India's forests very seriously -- sometimes much to the chagrin of state governments and mining companies. Will the CEC too be dissolved once the National Green Tribunal is set up? It is perhaps this body that the Minister may need to save - if he is serious about his role of protecting India's forests.
Trouble for the new minister may arise from traditionally unknown quarters
his own government. A case in point - the Niyamgiri hills, Orissa, where India's most controversial and long drawn-out environment battle is being fought by hundreds of indigenous tribals. Plans are afoot to chop down the rich tropical forests of the Niyamgiri hills - for the Vedanta bauxite-mining project. Here too, murky dealings are on.
In letters accessed through an RTI [Right to Information] - it is clear that pressure came from the highest office in the country - the PMO to the Ministry in 2008, on the status of forest clearance that was pending with the MoEF. And herein lies the scam - since the project is being developed in a Fifth Schedule Area - land acquisition can only be undertaken by the State.
In this case the land will be handed over once acquired by state to a private company, which is Vedanta. Is it ethical for the state to be putting pressure on its own ministry on behalf of a private agency? The same state, which should as per the constitution be upholding the rights of the people. Now in 2009 will there be pressure on Ramesh too, to make sure that the process is expedited? And when pressure comes from his own Prime Ministers Office to dispense with infrastructure projects on forestland will he be able to continue his role as a watchdog of India's forests?
The second likely source of conflict will be state governments particularly those where the BJP is in power - Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Orissa - states with huge mining resources as well as forests.
In 2005, the Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh, Raman Singh wrote a letter to MoEF asking for declaration of forest in Korba as an elephant reserve to reduce human-elephant conflict. Three months later, a letter is written by the Confederation of Indian Industry - requesting for area not to be declared as elephant reserve as the area has huge coal deposits which could be detrimental to industrial interests. Never mind that the same area has had 20 elephant deaths as the elephants compete for space with humans with their forests gone. A far-sighted CM who wanted to protect the elephants has been silenced by commercial interest. What will the MoEF do in such cases?
Support the CII or the BJP CM?
These and other such contentious issues are what Ramesh will need to bite into - as he visits national parks and sanctuaries and poses for pictures on an elephant in Corbett.
In the meanwhile, India's green activists can take heart that in the lofty corridors of power they finally have access to a minister who is articulate, English-speaking much like the urban elite from which India's environment movement is drawn. Perhaps herein lies Ramesh's strength. He is a minister who is accessible and responsive. In the days to come can this Minister take the much-needed tough decisions which may sometime make him unpopular with his own government and put a clear moratorium on infrastructure projects coming up on elephant corridors and vital tiger habitats? Jairam Ramesh has his work cut out. And the greens have much hope from the new minister.
No bauxite mining at Niyamgiri yet
6 August 2009
Kolkata/ Bhubaneswar - The Orissa government has made it clear that mining of bauxite in the Niyamgiri hills in Kalahandi district will not be allowed till all the statutory clearances are obtained.
This is in response to the statement made by the Union environment and forest minister, Jairam Ramesh in the Rajya Sabha that Vedanta group can be prosecuted if it resorts to illegal mining of bauxite in Niyamagiri as the Anil Agarwal controlled firm has been given 'in principle approval' only.
He said, the company has only got the in-principle approval for forest diversion and it has not got the full forest clearance. If mining is taking place in Niyamgiri, then it is illegal, he was reported as saying in Rajya Sabha.
When contacted on the issue, the state steel and mines secretary, Ashok Dalwai said, all the protocols in the matter will be followed and no mining activity will be allowed at Niyamgiri till the stage-II forest clearance is obtained and the mining lease (ML) is executed.
It may be noted Anil Agarwal owned Sterlite Industries India Ltd
(SIIL) and the Orissa Mining Corporation (OMC) of the state government have formed a joint venture company under the banner of South-West Orissa Bauxite Mining Private Ltd for mining bauxite in the Niyamgiri hills.
"OMC is the lease holder and is a responsible entity, mining will not be allowed till all the statutory clearances are obtained", Dalwai asserted.
He said, though the leaseholder has got stage-I forest clearance from the Union ministry of environment and forest, it is yet to obtain the stage-II clearance. Stating the project has got the environmental clearance, he, however, pointed out that the mining lease (ML) is yet to be executed.
P K Panda, vice-president (mines), Vedanta Aluminium Ltd. (VAL) said, there is no mining activity on the top of Niyamgiri hill yet. While the environmental clearance has been obtaining for mining at Niyamgiri, the stage-II forest clearance is awaited.
Moreover, before start of mining surface rights will have to be obtained from the district collector. Under such circumstances it is not possible to start mining at Niyamgiri hills now, he added.