Norilsk Nickel named ‘dirtiest industry in the Arctic’Published by MAC on 2016-08-18
Source: Bellona.org, Thebarentsobserver.com
New book tells story of popular movement against heavy metals pollution
One of the most egregious cross-border mining and metals companies is the subject of a new work.
Part-owner oft he offending outfit, Norilsk Nikcel, is Vladimir Potanin.
A Norwegian businessman suggests his private yacht be seized and held as "leverage" against a clean-up by the massively polluting Russian enterpise that adjoins northern Norway.
However, Mr Potanin certainly isn't the only Russian oligarch who can be held responsible for the Kola peninsula legacy of damage and destruction (See: http://moneytometal.org/index.php/Interros_Holding)
See also previous on MAC:
2014-07-16 Norilsk Nickel plant leaks 66 tonnes of nickel into environment
2011-02-07 Norilsk Nickel: The Soviet Legacy of Industrial Pollution
2009-11-23 Norway's Pension Fund Pulls Investment in Norilsk Nickel
Norwegian politicians and citizens call Norilsk Nikel ‘dirtiest industry in the Arctic’
Anna Kireeva, translated by Charles Digges (with some clarifications by MAC)
August 11, 2016
KIRKENES, Norway – Residents of this Norwegian-Russian border town have long suffered enormous sulfur dioxide emissions from Russian industry, and say they’re fed up with weak reactions from their own politicians to the two-decade old problem.
An area event last week gathered hundreds of residents of the small town in highlighting their worries over the heavy metal emissions wafting in from the Russian Kola Peninsula’s Kola Mining and Metallurgy Company’s industrial complex towns, and requested their own local politicians break deadlocked talks between Oslo and Moscow to improve the situation.
The Kola company is spread out across Northwest Russia in three of the dirtiest industrial towns in the country: Nikel, Zapolyarny and Monchegorsk.
The Kirkenes event highlighted the recent publication of a Norwegian-authored book entitled Stop the Soviet Death Clouds, the name of the eponymous movement that was sparked in the early 1990s to fight trans-border pollution from the newly disbanded Soviet Union.
The authors of the book, many of whom took part in the original movement, said this early environmental movement was joined by some 40 percent of Norwegians living in areas abutting the new Russian border.
But according to Kare Tannvik, an activist and tourism businessman, some 26 years of demands have failed to abate the industrial pollution from Russia.
“We’re a small country with little influence,” he said during debates at the event. “We need international cooperation to solve this problem.”
Frank Bakke Jensen, a Norwegian parliamentarian, confirmed that not a single high-level meeting between Russian and Norwegian officials mentioned the pollution problem – without producing any results.
Former mayor Cesilie Hansen of nearby Sør-Varanger agreed.
She said that years of negotiations and meetings of a special Russian-Norwegian group created for this purpose have produced no agreements, including how to measure the pollution in the first place.
“We’ve wasted enormous amounts time and effort on talks and achieved nothing.”
When the negotiations proved futile, Hansen herself filed suit in 2013 with Norwegian prosecutors against the giant Norilsk Nickel, the parent company of the Kola Mining and Metallurgy Combine, a measure many international legal experts thought might bear fruit. But the effort was torpedoed by its own municipal administration.
Rune Rafaelsen, Sør-Varanger’s current mayor, told the gathering that Norilsk Nickel was the most polluting industry in the Arctic Region, and urged the matter be taken up by the Arctic Council and other international stages like the World Economic forum in Davos, Switzerland.
“If negotiations are exhausted we need to move on other fronts,” he said. “I don’t see any other option to solve the problems besides the political. You can’t sully your own yard without sullying your neighbors. As mayor I must do something or I am a bad mayor.”
Yet, he underscored that the issue would not be decided at a local level.
Rafaelsen said Murmansk Regional Governor Marina Kovtun “knows the problem well” but that it transcended being a regional issue and must be pursued at a federal level.
Event participants suggested various ways of dealing with the problem.
Rafaelsen said that suspending markets abroad to Norilsk Nickel would dig the pollution question out of mothballs. He said the Russian industrial monolith, which delivers a third of the nickel used worldwide, was “dirty and irresponsible,” and suggested boycotting its nickel until it cleaned up its act.
He added that one of the oldest and dirtiest nickel plants in Norilsk was closed, and suggested the same be done with the nickel smelting plant in the Kola Peninsula industrial town of Nikel.
“A new plant corresponding to contemporary ecological demands needs to be built in place of the one that is now smoking away,” Rafaelsen said.
Businessman Tannvik took aim at Vladimir Potanin, who holds a majority share of Norilsk Nickel, making him one of the wealthiest men on the planet. Potanin's yacht is estimated to be worth €100 million to €125 million
“The cost of this yacht alone is equivalent to the expenses required to make production in Nikel ecologically clean,” said Tannvik.
As such, he suggested that talks to make the company more green should be undertaken with Potanin himself – using the yacht as leverage.
“Separate him from his yacht in Europe,” said Tannvik. “Close off his entry into European countries, maybe this will make him scratch his head. This doesn’t require money or year of negotiation. Does Norway have the courage to suggest this to the rest of the world?”
Others attending the event wondered why no influential Russian figures represented. They were also interested in whether residents of Nikel were too intimidated to speak for themselves. No one was on hand to answer these questions.
Numerous among those who took part in the debates mentioned Bellona’s efforts in the cross-border pollution issue. They understood that, during these trying times, the NGOs Russian offices are experiencing that further involvement was impossible. And they sympathised with the fact that neither Russian citizens nor civil society were actively intimidated away from the levers of power.
Yet, Bellona has been attempting to address the problem of cross-border sulfur dioxide contamination. It’s not published a report on Norilsk Nickel’s pollution, but had held and plants to hold more talks with the Kola Mining and Metallurgy Company’s management. Bellona’s news website also regularly publish on developments on the issue.
Bellona says the problem can be solved only by economic pressure. Emissions will fall only when dirty production becomes unprofitable.
“The volume of sulfur dioxide emissions will seriously drop only when nickel consumers begin demanding guarantees of its clean production,” said Nils Bøhmer, Bellona’s executive director said. “Only in those circumstances will the company gain the economic sense to invest in clean production.”
At the beginning of the year, Russia’s Federal State Statistics Service, Rosstat, published a report (in Russian) naming the Russian cities with the worst atmospheric pollution. Nikel was included in the list.
Russia’s Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, or Gidromet, meanwhile published data (in Russian) showing that during the entire 31 days of July 2016, sulfur dioxide emissions didn’t exceed allowable limits on merely four days. For the remaining 27, emissions reached six to eight times allowable limits.
26 years on, Russian death clouds still descend on Norwegian borderlands
A new book tells the story about how a popular movement gathered the whole community of Kirkenes in a joint protest against heavy pollution from neighboring Nikel. More than two decades later, the winds still bring poisonous sulphur across the border.
August 4, 2016
The Soviet Union was on the verge of collapse, the border was opening and a wave of environmental activism was flowing across Norway. In Kirkenes, the Norwegian border town, a popular movement against the nickel plant in the neighboring Russian municipality of Pechenga quickly gained momentum.
The movement, which got the name «Stop the Soviet Death Clouds», was established in 1990 and soon won support from big parts of the local community. It marked the start of a long-lasting Norwegian battle against Russian nickel polluters, a battle which, albeit in a different format, continues to this day.
The book, which was released this week, gives a picture of how members of the movement took bold action and literally broke borders in their bid to stop the Russian polluters. It also tells how the movement managed to attract wide-reaching attention from all of Norway, even from the top of the country’s government.
At that time, the plant in Nikel emitted up to 300,000 tons of sulphur dioxide per year. Today, the emissions are significantly smaller, but the plant still remains the by far worst polluter in the region.
Figures from the Federal Hydrometeorology Authority in Murmansk show that the plant on 2nd August this year emitted up to eight times the allowed level of sulphur dioxide.
Together with the plant in Nikel, company Norilsk Nickel runs a string of other heavily dirty production facilities in both the Kola Peninsula and the west Siberian Taymyr Peninsula. That makes it one of the worst polluters in the whole Arctic.
A role for the Arctic Council
In a debate organized in Kirkenes this week, Norwegian MP Frank Bakke-Jensen suggested that the pollution by Norilsk Nickel be addressed by the Arctic Council. «It’s a clear case, people will listen to the Arctic Council and the body has the sufficient weight to address the problem», he underlined.
He agrees with Kirkenes Mayor Rune Rafaelsen that companies such as Apple and Tesla, both buyers of nickel products, will not want to be associated with the dirty practices of Norilsk Nickel.
The nickel pollution has since 1993 been on top of the agenda in bilateral environmental cooperation between Norway and Russia. Hundreds of technical and political meetings have addressed the problem. Meanwhile, Norilsk Nickel has continued its massive emissions.
Time for action
«Enough is enough, we are tired of talks and dialogue», says Cecilie Hansen, former town mayor of Kirkenes and inhabitant of the Pasvik valley, one of the Norwegian areas worst affected by the nickel pollution. «We have not managed to agree about a thing [..] now we need action», she underlined in the debate.
Town mayor Hansen made efforts to sue the nickel company, but was stopped at the last minute by the municipal council.
“Nick Mr. Potanin”
Kåre Tannvik was one of the main initiators of the «Stop the Death Clouds». In a stunt in 1990, he broke into a meeting between corporate representatives of the Russian mining company and poured dirt water into their glasses. He organized street protest rallies in downtown Kirkenes, and exerted pressure against the Norwegian government of PM Jan P. Syse, which ultimately cashed out 300 million NOK in support to plant modernization in Nikel.
«We have talked enough», Tannvik said in yesterday’s debate. «What we have to do is to nick the man behind it all, Mr. Vladimir Potanin, and make him Persona Non Grata in Europe», Tannvik underlined.