USA: Alpha Natural West Virginia Mines Found to Taint StreamsPublished by MAC on 2014-06-10
Source: Statement (2014-06-06)
It seems that Duke Energy isn't the only North American coal producer in trouble from water pollution (for Duke Energy coverage see: Fall out from Duke Energy's coal-ash spill continues)
Previous article on MAC: After North Carolina spill, coal ash ponds face extinction
Alpha Natural West Virginia Mines Found to Taint Streams
By Sophia Pearson
Bloomberg - http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-06-06/alpha-natural-west-virginia-mines-found-to-taint-streams
6 June 2014
Two West Virginia coal-mining units owned by Alpha Natural Resources Inc. polluted streams and damaged aquatic ecosystems, a judge said, ruling in favor of three environmental groups that filed a citizen complaint.
U.S. District Judge Robert Chambers's June 4 decision sets the stage for possible injunctions and civil penalties. The judge found that the mine operators, Alex Energy Inc. and Elk Run Coal Co., discharged high levels of pollution into Laurel Creek and Robinson Fork.
"In multiple ways, the chemical and the biological components of the aquatic ecosystems found in Laurel Creek and Robinson Fork have been significantly adversely affected by the defendants' discharges," Chambers in Huntington, West Virginia, said in his ruling.
Elk Run owns and operates the White Castle No. 1 surface mine and the East of Stollings surface mine, both in the state's Boone County. Alex Energy operates the Robinson North surface mine and the Wildcat surface mine, both in Nicholas County, according to the ruling.
Alpha Natural will appeal the ruling and expects "to see it reversed," Ted Pile, a spokesman for the Bristol, Virginia-based company, said in an e-mail.
"This decision essentially strips the state of West Virginia of its legitimate role as the primary regulatory authority for state waters and substitutes in its place the federal court as the primary authority," Pile said. "That's clearly not the intent of the Clean Water Act."
Alpha Natural is the second-largest U.S. coal producer, behind only Peabody Energy Corp.
The case is Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Elk Run Coal Co., 12-cv-00785, U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia (Huntington).
To contact the reporter on this story: Sophia Pearson in federal court in Philadelphia at firstname.lastname@example.org
Historic Federal Decision Finds West Virginia Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining Companies Guilty of Damaging Streams
Brandon Baker - http://ecowatch.com/2014/06/06/west-virginia-mountaintop-removal-coal/
6 June 2014
Believe it or not, no federal court in the U.S. had ever ruled that high conductivity discharges from coal mines were harmful to streams until this week.
Everything changed with a historic decision in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia that found two companies guilty of violating clean water protections. The decision was a result of a citizen lawsuit filed more than two years ago accusing mountaintop removal mines owned by Alex Energy and Elk Run Coal Co. contaminated waters in Laurel Creek and Robinson Fork with sulfate and other dissolved solids, adding toxicity to the ecosystem of aquatic creatures.
Streams in West Virginia have been damaged as a result of mountaintop coal mine removal, a federal court found this week. Photo credit: Brian Stansberry via Sierra ClubStreams in West Virginia have been damaged as a result of mountaintop coal mine removal, a federal court found this week. Photo credit: Brian Stansberry via Sierra Club
"Pollution such as the high conductivity discharges addressed in this litigation represents the steady degradation of streams that is stealing the future from generations to come," Cindy Rank of the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, said in a statement from the Sierra Club. "Passage of the Clean Water Act over 40 years ago was a wise and prescient recognition that waters of the US can support a healthy human population and economy only when those waters are healthy themselves.
"[The federal] court decision makes it clear that the integrity of our streams must be protected from the real danger of being destroyed by the millions of tiny cuts made by activities like the coal mining operations along Laurel Creek and Robinson Fork."
The Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Sierra Club and West Virginia Highlands Conservancy filed the suit. The decision represents a change of heart for federal courts. Guidance from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on mountaintop removal's impact on streams was struck down in In July 2011. Now, the court ruled that the process results in a loss of diversity for aquatic life because "only pollution-tolerant species survive" in what were once thriving aquatic ecosystems.
"This decision further confirms that the science overwhelmingly shows that coal mines in Appalachia are harming streams due to conductivity pollution," said Aaron Isherwood, Managing Attorney for the Sierra Club. "The court's ruling further underscores the need for EPA to engage in rulemaking to protect Appalachian streams from conductivity pollution that is very harmful to aquatic life."
Though the suit dealt specifically with Laurel Creek and Robinson Fork, Jim Hecker, co-counsel in the case and Environmental Enforcement Director at Public Justice, said the problem is widespread. He believes the decision will now force companies to internalize treatment costs they had been avoiding.
"In an earlier West Virginia case that was settled, a mining company estimated that the cost to construct a treatment system to remove conductivity from a 1000 gallon-per-minute flow of wastewater is over $18 million," Hecker said.
Though the decision is a landmark decision for the environment, it is merely one case and has not resulted in permanent legislation at the federal level, much less in West Virginia.
"As the court recognized in its decision, the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection is not enforcing its own narrative standards against mountaintop removal coal mines," Vivian Stockman of the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition said. "Unfortunately, that means it's up to citizens like us to enforce the law and protect our precious streams.
"Ultimately, protecting streams is not just for aquatic life, it is for us."