US: The war on lead advances to a new levelPublished by MAC on 2010-01-11
Source: Environmental News Service (ENS)
Lead poisoning is the prime environmental hazard threatening children throughout the United States - affecting an estimated 310,000 citizens under the age of six.
Now, the country's Environmental Protection Agency is proposing even more stringent standards, covering further sources of exposure to the deadly metal.
According to one study, keeping children "lead-free" would not only protect their lives, but also save the state of New Jersey around US$27 billion.
EPA Plans to Expand Lead Monitoring Network
Envionrmental News Service (ENS)
30 December 2009
WASHINGTON, DC - To ensure that the most vulnerable Americans are better protected from exposure to lead, the U.S. EPA is proposing to revise the monitoring requirements for measuring airborne lead.
Even at very low levels, exposure to lead can impair a child's IQ, learning capabilities, memory and behavior, the agency said in a statement last week announcing the revision.
The agency is proposing to require air quality monitoring around sources that emit a half ton or more of lead a year, lowering the current threshold from one ton a year to include more sources.
The proposal also modifies the current requirement for monitoring in larger urban areas. Monitors would be placed at each of the multi-pollutant monitoring stations being established in urban and rural areas.
These changes would allow monitoring at the largest sources of lead emissions and would more accurately track long-term trends and assess typical lead levels in communities throughout the country.
The EPA says the changes would improve the lead monitoring network to better assess compliance with the tighter National Ambient Air Quality Standards for lead established in 2008.
In November 2008, the EPA gave notice that the federal air quality standard for lead emissions would become 10 times more stringent - from 1.5 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air to 0.15 micrograms per cubic meter.
EPA is not reconsidering nor delaying the implementation of these new lead standards.
States will still need to deploy lead monitors around sources emitting at least one ton of lead a year by January 1, 2010.
This proposal to monitor more sources of lead is in response to a petition requesting EPA to reevaluate the air monitoring requirements finalized in 2008 along with the tightened national air quality standards for lead.
In January 2009, EPA received a petition to reconsider the lead monitoring requirements from the Missouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation, Natural Resources Defense Council, the Coalition to End Childhood Lead Poisoning, and Physicians for Social Responsibility.
EPA granted the petition to reconsider on July 22, 2009. This proposal represents the results of the EPA's reconsideration of the lead monitoring requirements.
Under the Clean Air Act, EPA sets and reviews national air quality standards for lead. Air quality monitors measure concentrations of lead throughout the country, and the EPA, state, tribal and local agencies use this data to ensure that lead is at levels that protect public health and the environment.
People can be exposed to lead emitted into the air by inhaling it or ingesting it after it settles on dust, drinking water or food. Ingestion is the main route of human exposure. Children are the most susceptible because they are more likely to ingest lead, and their bodies are developing rapidly. "There is no known safe level of lead in the body," the EPA says.
Today, industrial processes, primarily metals processing, are the major source of lead emissions to the air. The highest air concentrations of lead are usually found near lead smelters. Other stationary sources are waste incinerators, utilities and lead-acid battery manufacturers.
In the past, motor vehicles were the major contributors of lead emissions to the air.
In the United States, where lead had been blended with gasoline, primarily to boost octane levels, since the early 1920s, standards to phase out leaded gasoline were first implemented in 1973.
By 1995, leaded fuel accounted for only 0.6 percent of total gasoline sales. From January 1, 1996, the Clean Air Act banned the sale of leaded fuel for use in on-road vehicles, yet fuel containing lead may still be sold for off-road uses, including some aircraft and marine engines, race cars and farm equipment.
Commercial aircraft do not use leaded fuel, but fuel used for piston-engine aircraft still contains lead. As a result, the EPA is proposing to treat airports identically to other sources of lead when determining if source-oriented lead monitoring is needed. The agency is requesting comments on the availability of data that may be useful in setting an alternative emission threshold for airports.
Lead poisoning is the number one environmental hazard threatening children throughout the United States, affecting an estimated 310,000 children under the age of six, according to the Coalition to End Childhood Lead Poisoning.
"Children are frequently poisoned by ingesting lead dust that has accumulated on their hands, fingers, toys, or clothing from lead hazard sources like floors and windowsills. It takes only small amounts of lead to harm a child," the coalition says.
Once taken into the body, lead is accumulated in the bones. Depending on the level of exposure, lead can adversely affect the nervous system, kidney function, immune system, reproductive and developmental systems and the cardiovascular system, the EPA warns.
Lead exposure also affects the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood. The lead effects most commonly encountered are neurological effects in children as well as high blood pressure and heart disease in adults. Some studies also link childhood lead blood levels to violence later in life.
The only way to know for sure if a child is being exposed to lead hazards is through a blood lead test.
Keeping kids lead-free could save N.J. $27B
22 December 2009
New Jersey could save as much as $27 billion in costs to society by keeping children free of lead poisoning, a report released yesterday said.
In "The Social Costs of Childhood Lead Exposure in New Jersey," Columbia University professor Peter Muennig said fewer children with lead poisoning would save the state on special education, medical treatment and incarceration.
"When young children are exposed to environmental lead, permanent damage can occur to parts of the brain involved in higher intellectual function and behavior," Muennig wrote. "The greater the reduction in lead exposure, the more likely New Jersey's children will achieve success and realize their full potential."
The report supports rules New Jersey has proposed to improve lead poisoning detection and treatment. Those regulations came about after a 2008 report by the state's public advocate revealing a childhood lead poisoning problem that was "stubborn and enduring" -- especially in cities with old housing, such as Newark, Trenton and Camden.
The changes would reduce the blood lead "level of concern" in children from 20 micrograms of lead per deciliter of whole blood to 15. They would reduce the threshold to as low as 10 when a child has two test results between 10 and 14.
State officials have said the rules could be adopted as early as spring.
"This report provides the new governor and incoming Legislature with information that can be used to build on that progress and ensure all of our children grow up lead-free," said Public Advocate Ronald Chen, who supports the rules and commissioned the Muennig report. He made his comments in a news release announcing the report.
Muennig estimates 86,416 New Jersey children, newborn to 6 years old, would have a minimal risk of lead poisoning; 584,520 children a moderate risk; and 12,633 children a moderate to severe risk.
He predicted the future yearly earnings of children in that age group, factoring in the costs of special education, medical treatment, criminal activity, incarceration, reliance on public assistance and premature death. Muennig concluded "the net societal benefits arising from these improvements in high school graduation rates and reductions in crime would amount to $31,000 per child."
Including $6 billion in improved health outcomes, the savings come to about $27 billion.