Massive tailings pond breach at Mount Polley Mine in CanadaPublished by MAC on 2014-08-05
Source: Postmedia News, Mining.com
There has been another astonishingly large breach in a tailings dam in Canada (see for instance Canada: Massive coal mine leak damaged fisheries, habitat. Ironically the Canadian government often promotes Canadian expertise in 'sustainable mining' as 'best practice' to other countries.
The helicopter video footage is breath-taking - see for instance http://globalnews.ca/news/1490361/tailings-pond-breach-at-mount-polley-mine-near-likely-bc/.
Before-after imagery from satellites is available here: http://blog.skytruth.org/2014/08/landsat-mt-pooley-spill.html
According to the company Murray Edwards has been the Company's largest shareholder since 1994, and currently owns 36% of the Company's shares. However, as the Money to Metals site points out he "is notorious as one of the biggest investors in so-called oil (or tar) sands in Alberta, Canada – alleged to be one of the dirtiest sources of fuel."
Mount Polley Mine's tailings pond breach of five million cubic metres of contaminated waste called ‘massive environmental disaster'
5 August 2014
As far back as 2011, concerns were raised about the tailings pond at the Mount Polley Mine. Brian Olding and Associates, an environmental consulting firm, prepared a detailed report that was submitted to the provincial Ministry of the Environment.
"We looked at the pond and we thought there was monitoring required. We wanted an emergency contingency plan in place."
Olding was hired jointly by the Williams Lake Indian Band, the Soda Creek Indian Band and mine owner Imperial Metals to conduct an independent review of the Mount Polley Mine 75 kilometres southeast of Quesnel and prepare a technical assessment report on the proposed discharge of water from a tailings pond.
At about 3:45 a.m. on Monday the very pond he reported on was breached, sending over five million cubic metres of contaminated water and toxic slurry into Hazeltine Creek, uprooting trees with its force, and making its way toward Quesnel Lake.
By late Monday on the advice of provincial authorities, the Cariboo Regional District had issued a complete ban on drinking, swimming and bathing in the waterways surrounding the mine and extended it to include Polley Lake and all the waterways near the Mount Polley Mine, including Quesnel Lake, Cariboo Creek, Hazeltine Creek and "the entire Quesnel and Cariboo Rivers systems right to the Fraser River."
Residents have been told not to allow pets or livestock to drink the water.
Chief Anne Louie of the Williams Lake Indian band said this is a "massive environmental disaster." Louie, who was in meetings all day dealing with the crisis said "We held discussions with the mine staff related to the potential of this situation occurring. We have a report that we worked on a couple of years ago." Louie said she will be having community meetings to address the issues in the coming days.
The ban will cover at least 300 people in the region, especially in the town of Likely, said Al Richmond, chairman of the Cariboo Regional District. The ban will stay in place until water samples have been analyzed.
"It's an emergency situation. We haven't yet declared a state of emergency, but the province and Interior health authorities and emergency services are working together to make an assessment," said Richmond.
The escaping wall of water and slurry created a massive debris field that backed into Polley Lake and tumbled down Hazeltine Creek and into Quesnel Lake.
"What we know so far is that debris from the tailings pond backed up a little into Polley Lake, which absorbed some of the flow, but the majority of it went down into the Hazeltine Creek," Richmond said.
"The creek (used to be) four feet wide. Now it's 150 feet wide.
"At this time, the debris stopped where it intersects with the Quesnel River and there has been no significant flow into Quesnel Lake."
Richmond said residents have expressed concerned about the debris taking out the Likely bridge, but that so far the bridge is holding.
In the meantime, Richmond said tanker trucks are being prepared to deliver water to local residents. But manpower is slight, and cellphone coverage in the area is patchy.
"There are only four people available from the volunteer fire department as first responders," said Richmond.
The service road that connects Likely and the town of Horsefly was washed out by the spill, said Richmond, but the communities can be reached by other roads.
As of press time, Richmond said he didn't know if the spill had been contained, or if it is still moving down the creek.
"The potential long-term impact to waterways, the watershed and roads is huge," said Richmond.
Officials from Imperial Metals, which operates the Mount Polley Mine, did not return phone calls or emails from The Vancouver Sun on Monday, but according to a 2011 article in the Williams Lake Tribune, the capacity of the tailing pond has been a concern as far back as 2009.
At that time, the Mount Polley Mine applied for a permit from the Ministry of the Environment to discharge effluent into Hazeltine Creek.
The paper reported then how Mount Polley general manager Tim Fisch explained that the "closed system" of containing the toxic effluent in the pond was "difficult as the mine accumulates more water than it can use in a year due to its location in a ‘net positive' precipitation zone ... the amount of run-off requires dam raises and prohibits the formation of proper tailings beaches which could increase seepage and cause conditions that are ‘geotechnically unstable.'"
In 2011, Likely Matters reported the Williams Lake Indian Band opposed any permit to discharge effluent into Quesnel Lake due to environmental sensitivities.
"The tailings pond was filling out and they needed to get rid of the water," said Olding of the dam, which he described as "earthen." "The walls were getting too high and the water was getting too high.
"I'm not a structural engineer," said Olding, "but it appeared from a common sense point of view that you could not continue to build that up higher and higher."
One of the conditions of receiving the permit to discharge the effluent into the Hazeltine Creek was a review by the Environmental Minister of Olding's report.
Olding said he last spoke with the minister a year ago about the matter. At that time, he said no permit had been issued for effluent discharge from the pond.
"We took 1,200 pages of data and (the proposal of effluent discharge) was problematic. You have to estimate what the impact of the contaminant is going to be on every organism down below. It gets complex very quickly."
So complex that Olding said, "while the ministry was reviewing our report, the mine was reluctant to go through with the permit."
Olding said Monday's breech is a "very serious environmental situation. Hazeltine Creek runs into Quesnel Lake and that lake has, I believe, about a quarter of the Sockeye production in the province. The Quesnel River hits the Fraser River and the impact on the communities is going to be very high. No one knows what was in that tailings pond."
Craig Ritson, owner of the Quesnel Lakeshore Room and Board, said concerns were raised about effluent at community meetings with the mine about a year ago when the company sought a gradual release of tailings down Hazeltine Creek.
"The concern at the time was exactly what we are facing now because so many people draw their water from that lake and nobody wanted to take a chance that it would affect the water quality here.
The Mount Polley Mine, operated by Imperial Metals, is an open-pit copper and gold mine with a four-km wide tailings pond built with an earthen dam. Tailings from operations like the Mount Polley Mine contain chemical contaminants and effluent.
According to their website, Imperial Metals employs about 1,000 people in B.C.
Quesnel Lake feeds into Quesnel River, which feeds into the Fraser River.
Phone calls to Imperial Metals went unreturned on Monday, and no one from the Ministry of the Environment was available for comment, although they confirmed the breach on Twitter.
First Nations, environmentalists worry about salmon run after Mount Polley
Michael Allan McCrae
6 August 2014
Chilliwack First Nations have fielded worries from environmental groups and their own members about the Fraser River salmon run after the Mount Polley tailings pond breach early Monday.
"They're all very concerned about this disaster. They want to know how quickly it will get here and what can be done," said Ernie Crey, a fisheries advisor for Sto:lo Tribal Council, in an interview with the Chilliwack Progress.
"A spill from a mine tailings pond is a serious matter and the potential impact can't be underestimated."
Gord Sterritt, executive director of the Upper Fraser Fisheries Conservation Alliance, outlined some threats from the spill that may affect salmon.
"It could alter their senses, put them in a bit of disarray and stress them out," Sterritt told the CBC.
"And they wouldn't be able to mate and get back to their spawning grounds," he added.
When the tailings pond dam broke, water flowed down Hazeltine Creek and into Quesnel Lake, British Columbia's deepest lake.
As a result of the spill the Cariboo Regional District implemented a water advisory and advised residents not to drink water from Quesnel Lake, Cariboo Creek, Hazeltine Creek and Polley Lake areas. The water advisory was extended to include the entire Quesnel River system right to the Fraser River.
The Cariboo Regional District has declared a State of Local Emergency as a result of the Mount Polley Tailings Pond Breach.
DISCLOSURE: The reporter Michael McCrae is an investor in Imperial Metals.
Imperial Metals ordered to stop toxic tailings spill
7 August 2014
Imperial Metals must stop the release of toxins from the damaged tailings pond at its interior B.C. mine and take responsibility for any role it played in the disaster, Bill Bennett, the province's minister of energy and mines, said Wednesday.
Bennett told a news conference in Williams Lake that the Vancouver-based company has been issued a pollution abatement order and could face up to $1 million in fines should it fail to comply.
The miner has also been ordered to file environmental impact assessments in connection with the incident.
"If the company has made some mistakes ... they will have to bear the responsibility," Bennett said.
The catastrophic failure early Monday of the tailings pond wall at the Mount Polley copper and gold mine near Likely released 10 billion litres of water and 4.5 million cubic metres of metals-laden fine sand, contaminating several lakes, rivers and creeks in the Cariboo region.
Three government inspectors are at the site to investigate the cause of the enormous breach, Bennett said, adding they will interview current and former mine employees for clues as to what went wrong.
"We'll listen to everyone," he said. "Over a period of time ... weeks, if not months, we'll determine how this happened."
Bennett said water levels in the tailings pond are low but rain could wash more pollutants into Polley Lake and so one pressing task is to repair the dam.
It's a very important job for the company and government to get their heads together and block any additional drainage," he said.
Another concern is that some of the tailings have "essentially formed a little dam" of their own and are blocking the mouth of Polley Lake, which has risen about 1.5 meters as a result, Bennett said.
"The company is going to have to deal with it very expeditiously," he said, noting that the miner is pumping water from the lake into a historic empty pit on the mine site in an effort to deal with the problem.
The results of initial water-quality tests are due to be released Thursday at a public meeting in Likely, the community worst affected by the disaster and which is under a water ban.
Meanwhile on Thursday, Premier Christy Clark will make her first visit to Likely since the dam failure three days ago.
Catastrophic Tailings Spill at Mount Polley Mine
MiningWatch Canada statement - http://www.miningwatch.ca/article/catastrophic-tailings-spill-mount-polley-mine
8 August 2014
On August 5, approximately 10 billion litres of wastewater and 5 billion litres of solid tailings waste escaped the impoundment at Imperial Metals' Mount Polley mine in the interior of British Columbia. The creek that received the brunt of the flow was completely obliterated, some of the waste backed up into Polley Lake and some the wastes and debris from the torrent continued downstream into Quesnel Lake. A local state of emergency was called and a precautionary ban was put on using surface and groundwater in the area. The following is our effort to synthesize the many reports and commentaries that have come out during the first four days following the spill, and to answer some of the questions we've been getting from media and the public. For background, we've relied on a 2011 report jointly commissioned by the Xatsul and T'exelc First Nations and Imperial Metals, the company's website, and a 2004 technical report.
What are tailings and what was in the impoundment?
Tailings are the wastes left over from the crushing, grinding, and processing of mineral ores. Because low-grade large-scale mines like Mount Polley are mining ores where the sought-after minerals (gold and copper in this case) are less than 1% of the ore, a lot of waste is created from processing the 20,000 tonnes of ore that went through the Mount Polley mill each day. During processing, the ground rock is mixed with water and reagents to remove the gold and copper, and the remaining slurry (mix of water and sandy or muddy solids) is pumped to the tailings impoundment for disposal. (See also our Mine Waste Primer.)
The Mount Polley tailings impoundment is no "pond" - it is nearly 2 square kilometres with a perimeter of 5 kilometres. As Iain McKechnie pointed out with this image on Twitter, that's almost the size of Vancouver's Stanley Park.
Tailings often contain residual minerals including lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, and selenium, that can be toxic if released to the environment. If a substance in the tailings is included in the toxic substances listed under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, mine operators must report the amount of these substances in the tailings to a publicly available database - the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI). (Prior to a legal challenge by MiningWatch, Great Lakes United, and Ecojustice, the mining industry was exempt from reporting.)
Below is a table with the toxics contained in the Mount Polley tailings from the last five years of reporting (this differs from earlier reported amounts, which included substances contained in waste rock as well as tailings). The extent to which these substances pose a threat to the environment depends on the geochemistry of the tailings and the surrounding conditions.
Substances in Mount Polley tailings as reported to the NPRI (in tonnes)
[See: http://www.miningwatch.ca/article/catastrophic-tailings-spill-mount-polley-mine for full table]
Tailings also include reagents used in processing the ore. Reagents used at Mount Polley include xanthates, which are known to be toxic to aquatic organisms, but the company estimates that most of the residual xanthates leave the site with the mineral concentrate. Testing of processing chemicals in tailings and effluent is not currently required by Environment Canada or the B.C. government.
What are the effects of the spill?
The most obvious impact of the spill is the destruction of the 10 kilometre-long Hazeltine Creek watershed. A small tributary to Quesnel Lake, the creek has been completely buried in tailings and a huge swath of trees mowed down. According to the B.C. Fisheries database, Hazeltine Creek provided habitat for chinook, coho, and sockeye salmon, rainbow trout, and a number of other fish species. If it is even possible to restore the habitat for these species, it will require removing the tailings from the creek bed, re-establishing a natural creek bottom, getting vegetation to regrow along the shore and keeping the water and sediments clean enough to support a healthy ecological community.
While much of the tailings remain in the Hazeltine Creek watershed, some of the solids went into Polley Lake and Quesnel Lake, both of which are important recreational fishing areas with high quality water that are used as a drinking water sources by local residents.
Initial testing of Quesnel Lake by the B.C. government has not shown any impairment to the use of the lake as drinking water or for aquatic life according to established standards. This may be thanks to the lake's large size and outflow that would have diluted and dispersed any contaminants from the wastewater. Much of the contaminant load from the spill will be in the sediments, which will settle out of the water column and not be captured in surface water samples. These are very preliminary findings and until the tailings upstream are stabilised, contaminant loading to the lake will continue. It is very difficult to know what the medium or long-term repercussions for Polley Lake, Quesnel Lake and aquatic communities further downstream will be. Fish - and in particular salmon - are extremely sensitive to several of the substances listed above, and much more work is needed to evaluate the risks.
The spill has had significant emotional and psychological impacts with the shock and grief of witnessing this kind of disaster and the uncertain future of a cherished watershed. Chief Bev Sellars of the Xatsull First Nation told the media that many members of her band were in tears when they learned of Monday's release. "Because they know the destruction that's going to happen from this breach. It's just a real sad day."
The local community is also stressed by the immediate loss of the 300 jobs at the mine and the uncertainty about when or if the mine will reopen.
The financial costs of cleaning up the spill will be considerable and are estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Mining companies are required to post financial assurances with the province for routine clean up costs at the end of a mine's operating life; unfortantely these costs are not made public. A report by University of Victoria Environmental Law Clinic indicates that these amounts may not be sufficient for routine mine closure - let alone a major disaster like this. Imperial Metals admitted that its insurance is not likely to cover all the costs with the President stating: "I made the commitment, to the best of my ability. If it's $400 million, then we are going to have to get mines generating to make that money to do the cleanup. We don't have $400 million in the bank, so we'll have to make that to do it."
If Imperial does not fund the clean-up citizens will be left with the financial, environmental and social costs of the spill.
What could have caused the failure?
Tailings in an impoundment like the one at Mount Polley remain saturated so they have little to hold them together, and a breach in the impoundment means the water and solids flow together out of the impoundment and then downstream. It does not require a large breach to start this process, so Imperial Metals' statement that the portion of the impoundment that failed is relatively small compared to the total length of the dam is totally irrelevant.
Catastrophic (sudden and severe) failure is an inherent risk of large tailings dams. The risks increase with the size and height of the impoundment and the amount of water relative to the solids kept in the impoundment. As Andrew Nikiforak points out, as we exploit lower and lower concentrations of minerals, tailings impoundments are growing larger and larger and more and more risky.
In addition to the water from processing the ore, large tailings facilities also accumulate rainwater. If it does not evaporate, excess water must be released to maintain the impoundment, usually following treatment to remove contaminants such as heavy metals and suspended solids. Excess water that flows over the top of an impoundment is extremely dangerous as it can erode the impoundment wall, creating a gully that increases rapidly in size as ever more waste flows out of it. The weight of excess water also increases the pressure on the impoundment walls and destabilise them if there are any weaknesses.
Impoundments are built to the Canadian Dam Association's standards and are, in theory, supposed to withstand extreme weather and seismic events. The Mount Polley impoundment was built in 1997, and it was evaluated and deemed secure by Amec consultants in 2004 before it was put back into use after the mine was closed for several years. There is no indication that any extreme weather or seismic activity contributed to the failure.
There are several lines of evidence that indicate that Imperial Metals amplified the inherent risks of a tailings impoundment by storing a large volume of water and allowing the water level to go beyond the modest one-metre buffer demanded by its provincial permit. The CBC reported that the B.C. Ministry of Environment gave five warnings to the company about the amount of water in the impoundment. The Minister of Energy and Mines disputed this statement, noting that there was only one incident in May of this year and that it was dealt with quickly by the company pumping excess water into a mined out pit.
The engineering firm responsible for the initial construction and oversight of the impoundment up to 2011 issued a statement saying that it also cautioned the company and BC that the embankments and impoundment were "getting large and it is extremely important that they be monitored, constructed and operated properly to prevent problems in the future".
A former mine employee spoke to the media, stating that the water was being kept too high and there were previous breaches to the impoundment. If high water was a reoccurring problem and regulators gave the company a series of warnings rather than taking stronger measures, a serious failure of the regulatory system occurred.
Imperial requested a discharge permit to release more water from the impoundment in 2009 but did not provided a satisfactory plan to do so, another application to discharge was being processed at the time of the spill. The 2011 report jointly commissioned by neighbouring First Nations and Imperial focussed on the discharge issue and provided a number of recommendations to Imperial about how to proceed. From the available information it seems clear that Imperial continued building the impoundment walls higher rather than dealing with the water. The former employee also noted a failure to increase the width of the base of the impoundment to stabilize it as the height increased.
In his critical editorial in the Northern Miner, John Cumming, made a point of noting that Imperial Metals is a member of Canada's mining establishment not some rogue fly by night operation. They are also members of the Mining Associaiton of Canada and have been implementing the Association's Tailings Management Program as part of the Towards Sustainable Mining Initiative. MiningWatch has repeatedly asserted that such voluntary management approaches are inadequate to deal with the risks associated with mining.
Mining engineer and I Think Mining blogger Jack Caldwell summed up his observations of the available evidence this way: "I suspect it failed because there was too much water in the dam, the corner gave way, an upstream slide occurred, and the disaster ensued. They are saying nobody could have anticipated this. Rubbish. It was entirely predictable given the facts."
Could this happen at other sites?
This is the largest tailings spill in Canadian history but certainly not the first. Just last year, on October 31, 670 million litres of coal slurry spilled from an impoundment at the Obed coal mine into the Athabasca River near Hinton, Alberta. The Coalition Québec meilleure mine has documented many smaller recent spills in that province.
Whenever we have the combination of an inherently risky waste management option, combined with lax government and a company that pushes the risk boundaries, we are likely to have another failure.
The other crucial issue about tailings impoundments is that they remain on the landscape forever. As Water Matters' Bill Donahue pointed out to the CBC, impoundments may be portrayed as a final solution, but they are not. If left on the landscape forever, the likelihood of failure eventually approaches certainty.
What are the alternatives to tailings impoundments?
Disposing tailings slurry into an impoundment is not the only way to manage the millions of tonnes of waste generated by modern-day mining. Some mines, mostly underground mines extracting smaller volumes of ore, backfill exploited areas with tailings - a safe and sound option. Drying tailings or turning them to a paste that then hardens and dries are two other options. All these options add costs to mining operations, and so are not favoured by corporate interests focussed on the bottom line. They also have their own technical challenges. See our Mine Waste Prime for more.
An option that must also be considered is simply not mining a particular deposit. Where ecological and social risks are high and the economics don't allow for a more secure longer-term solution, not mining remains the only guaranteed way to keep tailings out of streams, rivers, and lakes.